Choosing the right foundation for your skin tone can be one of the most intricate things you can do. If you don’t choose the right color for your tone, it would be a waste. But if you do choose right, every other thing has a chance to fall into place. Hence, we are comparing L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations.
These two represent the thousands of foundation choices you could make. The steps that would be reviewed here would help you know what to look out for when choosing your foundation.
L’Oréal is a huge brand and a household name. it ranks among the top 1% of the world’s biggest skincare and cosmetics brands. Yes, a giant in the beauty and cosmetics world. So you know you are not seeing this out if media hype.
In this comparison, therefore, we will look at what is unique about each product. We will also take a look at what similarities, pro and cons they have. We aim to give you a thorough information so that you will leave, knowing which suits you better.
Comparison Overview – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
To get a summarized view of the main differences, let us start off with who can wear which. The Pro-Matte is just what the name says, matte. It is just right for you if you have oily, combination or normal skin. it completely sucks up the extra shine, leaving your face fresh all day.
On the other hand, the Pro-Glow gives a dewy look. What does that mean? The finish you get from it is not matte but some creaminess. So, this would be perfect for people with dry skin or who have dry patches. Just as the name says, it gives a glow to the skin that the Pro-Matte doesn’t.
The Pro-Matte is 102 Shell Beige. This color is light but is slightly darker than the Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural. The 102 Shell Beige is probably one of the lightest shades in the Pro-Matte line of foundations. If you have pale skin, you may want to try this color.
The 202 Creamy Natural is also for light-skinned wearers. In fact, most of its colors are for light-skinned people. If you are really light-skinned, you could try the 202.
Additionally, the coverage of the Pro-Matte 102 is medium, as is that of the Pro-Glow 202. But the former is more buildable than the latter. That is, the Pro-Matte affords more coverage and can be built to full than the Pro-Glow.
This is because the Pro-Matte is slightly thicker and darker than the Pro-Glow. The Pro-Glow is super light and even though it is buildable, it may not hide as much as the Pro-Matte would.
Price/Value Ratio – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
The difference in their prices is not much. Whichever one you choose; the price range does not make much difference to your pocket. What’s more, they are both pocket-friendly as they are both drugstore foundations.
When it comes to their benefits, compared to their prices, they offer a lot. Now, it has become common practice with many brands to get more customers through cheaper products. But this does not detract from the effectiveness of these products.
If you weigh what you gain with what you have to pay to get either one, you will find that you are making a great bargain and we are not just saying. Besides, as we always say, you don’t lose much even if you end up not liking the results you get.
Comparison Table – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
|Color||Shell Beige||Creamy Natural|
|Skin Type||Oil, Combination, Normal||Dry, Normal, Combination|
|Coverage||Medium but Buildable||Medium but Buildable|
|L'Oreal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte Liquid Longwear Foundation Makeup, 102 Shell Beige, 1 fl. oz.||PrimeEligible||Buy Now|
|L'Oreal Paris Makeup Infallible Up to 24HR Pro-Glow Foundation, 202 Creamy Natural, 1 fl. oz.||PrimeEligible||Buy Now|
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.Prices pulled from the Amazon Product Advertising API on:
Who Can Wear Which? – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
|As the name states, it has a matte finish. If you have really oily skin or get oily patches to your normal/combination skin, this option would go best for you.
Again, your location could decide which you wear. Arid zones tend to dry out the skin so you may not find this option very convenient. Using matte finish products wouldn’t be so good for your skin in such areas.
This is also true for the season. Even oily skin tends to behave in winter. So you may want to go a little bit dewy at such times.
But if you are going to have a very busy day and wouldn’t have time to touch up frequently, matte finish would do a lot for you.
|Go and glow with this option. Dry or combination skin types do not have to be a burden anymore. This option has a dewy or radiant finish, which makes it great for dry skin.
In super-hot weather, though, you may find that your face may develop more shine with it. This is because it is formulated to add some visible moisture or shine to the skin.
If you find that you have to spend time outdoors, under the sun, you could go for this. It contains broad spectrum SPF, which would protect from both UVA and UVB rays.
You can also use it if you find you tend to have dry patches, no matter your skin type. You can mix it with your matte powder to reduce the shine in other areas.
Check out these other interesting comparison articles:
MAC Brave vs Velvet Teddy Lipsticks — Detailed Comparison
Maybelline Facestudio Master Conceal vs Revlon Photoready Concealers – In-depth Comparison
Clinique Almost Powder vs Superpowder Foundations – Broad Comparison
CC Cream by Olay vs Maybelline Dream BB Cream– Detailed Comparison
MAC Fluidline Eyeliner Gel vs Maybelline Eyestudio Gel Eyeliner – Extensive Comparison
Covergirl Clump Crusher vs Clump Crusher Extensions – Thorough Comparison
Common Features – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
As different as they may seem, the two foundations from two different lines still have some things in common.
They both feel very light to the touch. If you choose to apply either of them with your fingertips, you will find that they feel like air. They do not feel heavy or greasy, which is common with many liquid makeup products.
This is saying a lot because, from the feel, you already know they are going to feel light on your face.
Duration of Wear
Both foundations wear for a long time. On their packs, you will that the brand says they wear for 24 hours. That is for a whole day. However, who wears makeup, any makeup, for that long? We don’t think anybody does.
Nevertheless, it is just proof that the foundations will stay working for as long as you want. You can put them on in the morning and not have to reapply during the day. This is up to you, of course. Form this, though, you know you save yourself some time and money.
After dispensing pumps, squeeze tubes are the next best packages liquid skincare products can come in. And these two foundations come in squeeze tubes.
Just like pumps, they cut down messiness and waste. They also help to keep the products clean and hygienic.
Both are creamy and runny. It is as the day wears on that their different finishes would begin to show. But to start you off, none is dry to the touch but are creamy. This makes them easy to apply, gliding on easily. This also means they are easy to blend, without drying or creasing before you are done blending them in.
Their air-light texture and runny consistency already tell you that they are lightweight. They do not sit heavily or feel caked on the face. Rather, you can apply your powder and still feel natural. They feel as light on the face as they do to the fingers.
Video: The Lightness of the Pro-Glow 202
Check out an example of how air-light they are from this video of the Pro-Glow 202…
Unique Features – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
While the Pro-Matte and the Pro-Glow offer medium coverage, both are also buildable. However, their levels of buildability are different.
The Pro-Matte can be built to full-on coverage. If you are one to wear full makeup occasionally or once in a while, this option would serve you better. It will give you that well-covered look that comes with full makeup. This has the ability to cover every blemish that your concealer, if you use one, leaves out.
The Pro-Glow, on the other hand, can be built but does not mask as well as the Pro-Matte. It may not give you that masked or complete cover you may want if you wear full makeup. It can only go so far.
Broad Spectrum SPF
The Pro-Glow comes with broad spectrum sun protection factor, which is missing in the Pro-Matte. This does not, in any way, take away from the effectiveness of the Pro-Matte. But if you work a lot under the sun and wear foundation, the Pro-Glow would be a better option.
Broad spectrum here means it can offer protection from ultraviolet A rays and ultraviolet B rays. This is usually the better type of sunscreen to use, whether alone as a sunscreen or in a skincare product.
In the comparison table above, we listed the skin types ideal for each product. For the Pro-Matte, it is best to be used on oily, normal or combination skin. This is because it is matte and is drying to the skin. People with dry skin would not fare well with it.
For the Pro-Glow, the ideal skin type would be dry, combination or normal. It leaves a glow, or shine if you will, on the skin, which would not look good on oily skin. it keeps dry or patchy skin hydrated throughout the day.
Unique Pros – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
Unique Pros of the Pro-Matte 102 Foundation
This product offers better coverage than its counterpart. Even though the label says it is medium, it has been discovered that it can be built to full. It can be attributed to the higher pigmentation of the product. This sets it apart from the Pro-Glow foundation. For full-on makeup, this is the better option.
As a matte foundation, it dries up the oil that would have appeared as shine on the face. It leaves your face looking flawless and does not fall flat during the day.
For as long as you wear it, it remains in place. Oily skin does not have to settle for less anymore.
Video: Matte Finish of the Pro-Matte in Visuals
Watch this video to see what the finish of the Pro-Matte foundation really looks like.
Unique Pros of the Pro-Glow 202 Foundation
You can some protection from the sun with the inclusion of broad spectrum SPF. If you want to, you can use a little bit of extra sunscreen before applying it. But you can rest assured that even if you don’t, you are protected to some extent.
You could also call this the radiant finish. This is especially good for those with dry skin. If you do, you don’t have to get a cake or creasy look to your face due to using the wrong foundation. This option keeps your face dewy and moist for as long as you wear it.
Unique Cons – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
Unique Cons of the Pro-Matte 102 Foundation
There is no place where it is written that every foundation must come with sunscreen. The absence of it does not take away from its effectiveness as a foundation.
But if you get sunburned easily, having just a little sun protection would go a long way. The Pro-Matte doesn’t offer that. You would have to wear your own sunscreen under it.
Dries too Quickly
You may not get the chance to fully buff it or blend it in properly before it dries out. Even though it is creamy to the touch, its ability to get dry is too fast. It may mean having to apply another layer so you can blend it in.
Before you know it, the light peach undertone of the foundation would have darkened. A few minutes of air on your face may leave it looking darker than your neck. This is popular with many drugstore foundations.
Unique Cons of the Pro-Glow 202 Foundation
While it is buildable, the Pro-Glow 202 may not offer as good a coverage as the Pro-Matte 102. This is because of the slightly higher pigmentation found in the latter. If you have trouble with your skin, it may not offer the coverage you desire. But to get the full coverage, you would have to use many layers.
May Accentuate Pores
This may not happen to everyone but there is a chance that it would make your pores stand out. If you have not had pronounced pores before, there is a slight chance of that happening.
Check out these other interesting comparison articles:
Nars Radiant Creamy vs Maybelline Fit Me Concealers – Detailed Comparison
Maybelline Dream Lumi Touch Highlighting Concealers Radiant vs Ivory – Extensive Comparison
Milani Color Statement Black Cherry vs Revlon Super Lustrous Black Cherry Lipsticks – Honest Comparison
MAC Paint Pot Bare Study vs Maybelline Eyestudio Color Tattoo Metal Barely Branded – Extensive Comparison
Clinique Even Better vs Beyond Perfecting Foundations – Detailed Comparison
Garnier BB Cream vs Maybelline BB Cream – Extensive Comparison
Common Pros – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
|Long-wearing||This option can be worn for as long as 24 hours. Due to the fact that nobody intentionally wears makeup for that long, it is clear it is an indication of its staying power.
However, it has been proven that it can be worn all day without the need for reapplication.
|The same is applicable to this foundation.|
|Consistency||It is very liquid, runny if you may. But not too watery as to become a nuisance. This consistency makes it great for natural coverage.||Similarly, this option is runny.|
|Packaging||Additionally, it comes in a squeezable tube. The packaging retains its hygienic state and also reduces waste and messiness.||In the same vein, the Glow comes in a tube than can be squeezed.|
|Texture||It feels very light, like air, to the touch. It is almost as if you are touching mousse.||Likewise, the texture of the Glow is light as air.|
Common Cons – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
|Size||As good as the product sounds, it comes in a very small fluid content size. Considering the price, we would not expect anything else. But a little more would have sufficed.||The same applies to the Glow.|
General Feeling among Users – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
|Users like that it can be built to full coverage due to its higher percentage of pigmentation. They like that they get the choice to either leave it light or build it up.
They also like how it makes their face look even, without patches and without falling flat. The effect of the matte finish to oily patches makes all the difference to them.
But there are those who have complained about not getting the said results, even though they have oily skin. They complained that within a very short time, their faces began to shine. Some even complained that their faces were worse off from using it.
|The reception for the Glow seems to be better, even though the reviews are smaller. More people seem to have gotten the result they were looking for. The dewy look that often eluded dry skin was achieved with this foundation.
A user with oily skin reported to have found this option splendid for her skin. she even included before-and-after pictures. This goes to show that you use what works for you.
Then, there is the sunscreen. It was nothing new for them but that bonus was truly appreciated. Nothing like getting some sun protection along with your favorite product.
But another user complained about the white bits of shine in the product. What made many other users glad was what the user didn’t like. The shine was just too much and couldn’t be completely blended in.
Our Verdict – L’Oréal Paris Infallible Pro-Matte 102 Shell Beige vs Pro-Glow 202 Creamy Natural Foundations
|We like that it can be built to full coverage. It offers the chance to go natural or not. We also like that it can hold its own for as long as it does, even for very oily skin. This is at least true in most cases.
We would recommend it if you are looking for a really affordable but effective long-wear foundation. L’Oréal usually gives some of the finest products in makeup so you may find this great.
What we are not crazy about is that it dries too fast, even though it is creamy at first. It is listed as demi-matte but we find that it is full-on matte. It ends up being drying for people with dry patches, who depend on the fact it is listed as demi-matte.
And we also don’t quite appreciate the oxidation. If you get this in your exact color, you may end up having two tones after a few minutes. This is because it will darken as soon as some air hits it.
|We recommend this option to you if you have dry skin. again, if you are prone to burn in the sun under your makeup, we give this to you. This is especially true if you have really pale skin.
Protection from Sun Rays…
We like how it makes the face look so soft and dewy without looking ghastly. We also appreciate the fact that it contains some sunscreen that can protect from the UVA and UVB rays. Though this isn’t anything new, it is still a great bonus.
However, we are not ecstatic about its really light coverage. If you are one to wear light makeup or no makeup at all on most occasions, this is perfect for you.
But if you like to go full blast with your makeup, you may find this difficult to use. Even though it is buildable, it may take several layers to achieve that.